
Sources:
Ivezic, Zeljko. 2013. Personal communication.
Schneider A., Friedl M.A. & Potere D. (2009). A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data, Environmental Research Letters, 4 (4) 044003. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044003

Sources:
Ivezic, Zeljko. 2013. Personal communication.
Schneider A., Friedl M.A. & Potere D. (2009). A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data, Environmental Research Letters, 4 (4) 044003. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044003
Questions:
1) These odds are over what time period?
2) How big is large?
3) Would a “large” meteor that “missed” a city still cause, say, a giant tsunami? Or sufficient environmental/atmospheric/climatological impact that it would affect city-dwellers?
4) Why did you pick on London?
We had the Tunguska event in 1908 and of course the Chelyabinsk meteor on 15 February 2013. Since this is around 1 every hundred years, they must not fit this calculation’s definition of “large”. However they were still dangerous, so the admonition not to worry may be misplaced.
Then again, saying “Worry!” isn’t like saying there’s something to do about it.