Redrawing the United States of America

The United States of North America: with the British Territories and those of Spain according to the Treaty, of 1784.

This post originally appeared on Scientific American’s Guest Blog.

Borders are all-important imaginary lines that affect our lives in myriad ways. They define in a very literal sense where we live, who we call neighbors, and how we are governed. But in a world defined by instantaneous communications and commutes that can just as easily involve airports as train stations, many borders are relics of a bygone era.

The borders separating the United States’ 50 states are perfectly idiosyncratic, outmoded, even arbitrary. Obvious examples of their obsolescence abound: The New York metropolitan area has grown to encompass counties in four states. Kansas City is really two different municipalities divided by the Missouri-Kansas border. Chicago’s Metra commuter rail stretches into neighboring Wisconsin, just as Washington, D.C.’s Metro trains and busses collect riders from Maryland and Virginia.

This post was chosen as an Editor's Selection for ResearchBlogging.orgOne solution would be to throw out the old map and start fresh, something we have been doing since the dawn of time. In many cases, we’ve gone about it rather violently—examples include the conquests of the Roman army, the American Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, World War II, and countless other conflicts. European countries with imperial dreams carved up entire continents, and when the party was over, left borders of convenience that failed to reflect economic and cultural realities.

A new map of North America, 1778Still, not all attempts to reshape the map are driven by sinister motives. Barring the Civil War, efforts to redraw state boundaries within the United States have been relatively peaceful. In the early 1940s, residents of northern California and southern Oregon toyed with the idea of forming the new state of Jefferson, because they didn’t feel either state government was meeting their needs. The attack on Pearl Harbor put an end to that, though the name of the NPR station in the region pays homage to the secessionist movement. Other campaigns have been more flash than anything else. In 1992, a state senator from eastern Washington proposed splitting the state in two, highlighting the differences within the state. And this year, a group of attorneys raised the idea that Pima County should split from the rest of Arizona, such was their frustration with state politics.

Perhaps the most sweeping proposal was floated by geographer G. Etzel Pearcy. A professor at Cal State Los Angeles, he published a book in 1973 intriguingly titled A 38 State U.S.A. Using population density as his primary guide, he carved out—you guessed it—38 states. Among them were Dearborn (southeastern Wisconsin, northeastern Illinois, northern Indiana, and southwestern Michigan), San Gabriel (southern California, Las Vegas, and the westernmost parts of Arizona), and Alamo (Texas minus the panhandle). Hawaii was the only existing state spared the knife, though Pearcy couldn’t help leaving his mark and renamed it Kilauea.

No one since Pearcy has been so bold, but a recent paper by a group of geographers, sociologists, and mathematicians has again reconsidered the layout of the lower 48 states. Though they don’t go so far as to propose a replacement map, their study sought to determine which of today’s borders have real meaning. To do so, they used bill tracking data from the site Where’s George. If you’ve handled a $1 bill in the last decade, chances are one came stamped with a short note and a URL. Upon visiting the site, you’re prompted to enter the bill’s serial number and report your current ZIP code. On the surface, it seems like a curiosity. But buried within is a trove of anonymous data on human movement and interaction.

Data from the tracked dollar bills revealed a map that in most ways is drastically different. Though there are 48 states, the researchers found evidence of only about 12 distinct regions (see map below). The Midwest remained largely in tact, as does New England. But Pennsylvania was split in two by the Appalachian Mountains, while the southern half of Georgia was given over to Florida (which in turn lost part of its panhandle to a new Gulf shores region). And as far as Where’s George data is concerned, most of the western United States is indistinguishable.

Effective borders from Thiemann et al 2011

It’s a fun exercise to imagine “what if?”, but it’s unlikely that we’ll be losing any of the 50 stars on the American flag anytime soon. There’s a good chance any proposal would be outmoded at some point in the future. Most borders are too arbitrary to stand the test of time. That doesn’t mean they’re not important—they affect our economies, governments, and more—but they can be obsoleted just as easily as they were created.

Sources:

Pearcy, G. Etzel. 1973. A 38 State U.S.A. Plycon Press, Fullerton, California.

Thiemann, C., Theis, F., Grady, D., Brune, R., & Brockmann, D. (2010). The Structure of Borders in a Small World PLoS ONE, 5 (11) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015422

Maps scanned by Manitoba Historical Maps.

Related posts:

If the world’s population lived in one city…

The map that started it all

Ghosts of geography

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  1. I have to disagree with your last statement. It seems to me, that it often takes a war to move a political boundary (either a real war or some other figurative war). Boundaries might change in small ways, but I just don’t see them as becoming obsolescent easily. And though some may be arbitrary, there are some fierce loyalties societies hold dear when it comes to a border.

  2. With some cross-over which make sense according to economic region (West Virginia and Pittsburgh / Ohio, Texas and the West, Chicago and the Midwest) , these lines appear to correspond with federal reserve district boundaries. Which makes sense considering how dollar bills are distributed…

  3. “The New York metropolitan area has grown to encompass counties in four states.”
    That would be: New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and…..?

  4. Strange Maps had an interesting map of regions based on calling data back in July that may shed more light on distinguishable cultural zones than the WheresGeorge data might show:

    http://bigthink.com/ideas/39249?page=all

    Interestingly enough, New England shows the exact same breakdown (including the small portion of upstate New York), Florida still loses its panhandle, and Pennsylvania is still split in two.

  5. Half the people in the USA lives in 8 only states. That’s 16 senators for one-half the population and 84 senators for the other half. California has a population equal to 21 other states, yet only has 1 set of senators. These anachronisms no longer make sense since the (unfortunate) passage of the 17th Amendment (1913).

  6. Borders have a lot of cultural significance that I don’t think we would want to lose, but this post caused me to think about how much money is spent on reconciling 50 different sets of laws administratively, not to mention federal law. Could there be positive outcomes from states merging on an administrative level, creating megastates, to borrow from the idea of megacities.

    Of course there are a lot of cultural values embodied in the laws of each state (Louisiana and their Napoleonic legal heritage being a standout). I’m no expert…just thinking out loud here.